Ghouls and Grifters
Will this new evidence finally put to bed the insane theories about Charlie Kirk's murder?
Last week saw the seven-month anniversary of Charlie Kirk’s murder at Utah Valley University. Charlie Kirk has now been dead for seven months. And what has happened in those seven months—what has been done?
Also last week: new records were unsealed from the ongoing trial of Tyler Robinson, the man accused of killing Charlie Kirk. Among them is a letter addressed to his transsexual roommate and lover, Lance Twiggs—aka “Luna”—in which Robinson confesses to the murder, no ambiguity whatsoever.
“If you are reading this,” Robinson wrote, “I am likely dead, or facing a lengthy prison sentence. I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk and I took it.”
“I don’t know if I will/have succeeded, but I had hoped to make it home to you. I wish we could have lived in a world where this did not feel necessary. I wish I could have stayed for you and lived our lives together. I lack the words to express how much I love you, and how very much you mean to me. Please try and find joy in this life. I love you, always, Tyler.”
The unsealed affidavits provide details of Robinson’s communications in the hours after the murder, including messages on Discord in which he again confessed and also talked about planning the murder for “a bit over a week I believe.”
This unequivocal, unimpeachable evidence can now be added to the evidence already in the public domain—text messages, fingerprints, a palm print, cellphone and Google Maps data—all of which points to a single unequivocal, unimpeachable conclusion.
Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk.
Hopefully this will now be enough to silence the grifters, retards, ghouls and shameless profiteers who have done everything they can to muddy the waters since Charlie Kirk was murdered, harassing and defaming his widow and former colleagues, and spaffing away in the process a tidal wave of sympathy and goodwill that could have been used to do something, finally, about the radical left and its campaign of violence against its political opponents. Against us.
I believe, in years to come—assuming, of course, that we win—that the aftermath of Charlie Kirk’s murder will be studied as a textbook example of the right’s lamentable tendency to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. It’s baked in, a Pavlovian response, and it’s just so utterly self-destructive. Something needs to change, right now. The left would never behave this way if one of their own had been killed like Charlie Kirk.
Not that I’m saying Charlie Kirk’s murder was a victory. It wasn’t. It was a dreadful, dreadful defeat; the brutal snuffing out of a once-in-a-generation talent and a man who, if he didn’t become president himself one day, would certainly have played a key role in installing president after president for decades to come.
He had already done that in 2024: It’s hard to believe Trump would have won without Turning Point USA and its big, goofy, untiring and utterly inspirational young leader.
Instead of the right rallying round and accepting the patently obvious working hypothesis that Charlie Kirk had been murdered by a radical leftist—probably to impress his tranny girlfriend who hated Charlie Kirk because of his views about biology and gender—pretty soon we were being told Erika Kirk had commissioned the killing to take over TPUSA and she was going to marry JD Vance after he divorced Usha—Have you seen that TikTok where the plumber says he fitted TWO baths in Erika Kirk’s new house!?!?!?—and, actually, it was Israel that killed Charlie because jet fuel can’t melt human bones so don’t you see he was shot with a palm pistol wielded by a shape-shifting Mossad agent, here look watch this video explainer I found on Rumble…
